<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Faldon Forums - Election 2004 is over]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.faldon.org/feed/atom/topic/2596/"/>
	<updated>2004-10-12T09:09:00Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.faldon.org/topic/2596/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Election 2004 is over]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.faldon.org/post/34672/#p34672"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This year&#039;s election might as well be over.&nbsp; That is the conclusion I had a few weeks ago when Bush led by double digits in Gallup, Time and numerous other polls.&nbsp; It is the same one I have now.&nbsp; </p><p>I can&#039;t call a winner, but I think one overwhelming trend can be confirmed: it is a deadheat.&nbsp; Kerry leaners temporarily went to Bush because of the convention, CBS scandal and the swift boat thing.&nbsp; Now, undecideds are making up their minds and with the debates, partisan division is back in full swing.</p><p>This election will be remembered for unusually high turnout in the post-Watergate era.&nbsp; The first election after 9/11.&nbsp; One for the future of the Supreme Court, the economy, the war on terrorism and Iraq.&nbsp; One in which more people were interested earlier on and in more intensity.</p><p>The persuadable audience, of course, is actually quite low.&nbsp; When all comes down to it, about 17% as of late September considered themselves swing voters.&nbsp; Most of them, obviously, don&#039;t live in battleground states.&nbsp; This is because the big states usually aren&#039;t battlegrounds and because there are really less than 10 of them in total.</p><p>I&#039;d say a few hundred thousand people will really change their mind, at this point.&nbsp; We are a 49-49 nation, that is the new reality.</p><p>Notes on closeness aside, Bush isn&#039;t polling above or at 50% in any recent national poll, save ABC (which was over 4 days).&nbsp; </p><p>Gallup shows Kerry up by 2, Zogby by 3.&nbsp; His approval is below 50 again, at 47.&nbsp; My theory is the debates are starting to solidify in people&#039;s minds.&nbsp; The negative news out of Afghanistan and about WMD (or lackthereof) being in Iraq, obviously didn&#039;t help.&nbsp; The September jobs report was largely conceived of as a stinker, as well.</p><p>Bush has to win this debate, or he will lose the popular vote.&nbsp; My current map for an election day prediction is this:</p><p>Kerry might take Colorado, and he is running ahead in recent Ohio pulls by 1.&nbsp; </p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://uselectionatlas.org/USPRESIDENT/GENERAL/CAMPAIGN/2004/MEMBMAPS/pe20042401P27.gif" alt="http://uselectionatlas.org/USPRESIDENT/GENERAL/CAMPAIGN/2004/MEMBMAPS/pe20042401P27.gif" /></span></p><p>Kerry narrows out the popular vote.&nbsp; In this map, Kerry is Red and Bush is blue.&nbsp; Bush ties the electoral college, the Maine vote might be disputed at the SC, Bush would win that dispute too.</p><p>Yeah, I hate it too.&nbsp; If he &#039;wins&#039; like this, someone will probably try to kill him.&nbsp; It is also likely the country will become even more divided, if at all possible.&nbsp; The totals come to 269 269, and Bush wins by a vote in the House of Represenatives.</p><p>Note this is only a guess, and that it could still all change w/ an October surprise or of course the 3rd debate.</p><p>To me, it is undeniable this will be a close election.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Catbert]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.faldon.org/user/5/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2004-10-12T09:09:00Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.faldon.org/post/34672/#p34672</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
