<![CDATA[Faldon Forums - vote sexy for me thanks]]> 2006-04-11T12:50:10Z PunBB https://www.faldon.org/topic/3771/ <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> what exactly is the point of that game you guys play?  I go to the website and it looks like a rpg-type game but all I see is people asking for us to vote for their picture.......

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/595/ 2006-04-11T12:50:10Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54825/#p54825 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> excuse me while I go and retch in the corner.

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/833/ 2006-04-10T20:22:21Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54818/#p54818 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> Heh 12 is too high... They're nice and ripe at 5.

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/1152/ 2006-04-10T17:13:27Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54817/#p54817 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]>

(Though obviously it's rather sick. Below 12-ish is definitely too sick to be even somewhat arousing (regardless of its legal status). Not really into animal secks btw.)

But...But....Your from Amsterdamn....you can get that for like $3.50

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/1332/ 2006-04-10T10:31:30Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54814/#p54814 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> I do not recall ever saying the opposite.

(Though obviously it's rather sick. Below 12-ish is definitely too sick to be even somewhat arousing (regardless of its legal status). Not really into animal secks btw.)

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/212/ 2006-04-10T05:19:59Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54813/#p54813 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]>

Not really, by that logic ONE person appreciating a video featuring a horse fucking a 7-yr old schoolgirl in the ass for its artistic value (without getting turned on by it basically)

How could you not get turned on by that?

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/1152/ 2006-04-10T00:00:27Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54810/#p54810 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]>

rofl, dude

Pornography implies that they are engaged in something pornographic.

That is the most useless argument Ive ever seen, haha. You're saying that pornography is something of a nature 'pertaining to pornography' (pornographic). Well, DUH. =p

I guess you're implying the label pornography is only applicable to materials depicting actual 'acts' of sexuality. I think you're wrong there, pornography is material aimed at causing sexual arousal.

Even if I would agree to using your alternative definition, my first argument would still hold true. =P

Go get them tiger! Cya at hope tonight, dont forget to prepare the wine and the candles.

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/147/ 2006-04-09T19:48:52Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54806/#p54806 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> rofl, dude

Pornography implies that they are engaged in something pornographic.

That is the most useless argument Ive ever seen, haha. You're saying that pornography is something of a nature 'pertaining to pornography' (pornographic). Well, DUH. =p

I guess you're implying the label pornography is only applicable to materials depicting actual 'acts' of sexuality. I think you're wrong there, pornography is material aimed at causing sexual arousal.

Even if I would agree to using your alternative definition, my first argument would still hold true. =P

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/212/ 2006-04-09T06:55:33Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54805/#p54805 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> Pornography implies that they are engaged in something pornographic

They are not doing anything in that picture that could not be viewed by a 13year old legally.

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/1332/ 2006-04-09T04:14:36Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54804/#p54804 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> Not really, by that logic ONE person appreciating a video featuring a horse fucking a 7-yr old schoolgirl in the ass for its artistic value (without getting turned on by it basically) would be able to change the definition of such material from illegal pornography, to art. =P

The point is 1. how it was intended and 2. how it is generally viewed/considered by its audience.

I'll submit that it is possible that you at least appreciate it as art and instructive material... and do not view it for the purpose of sexual arousal, though unlikely. smile

I just wanted to contradict J3 though, I really dont think this issue is controversial or serious enough to get in a debate over, hehehe. =P (Everyone agrees with me anyway, heh)

(I take things far too seriously, this is true.)

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/212/ 2006-04-08T20:36:09Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54799/#p54799 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]>

1. I never called it pornography, I just implied it came from a pornographic site.

2. It IS pornography, seeing as it was NOT made with viewers appreciating it for any cultural, literary or instructional value in mind.

I appreciate it as cheap wallpaper AND its occasional instructional value, does that mean its not porn?

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/796/ 2006-04-08T20:08:53Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54798/#p54798 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> 1. I never called it pornography, I just implied it came from a pornographic site.

2. It IS pornography, seeing as it was NOT made with viewers appreciating it for any cultural, literary or instructional value in mind.

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/212/ 2006-04-08T16:06:03Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54797/#p54797 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> Its Erotic Art...not Pornography..... big_smile

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/1332/ 2006-04-08T10:47:24Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54796/#p54796 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> There is no art in ripping pics from pornographic sites.

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/212/ 2006-04-08T07:18:30Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54795/#p54795 <![CDATA[Re: vote sexy for me thanks]]> i voted too for ... NAH !!!
i joking i vote sexy wink

]]> https://www.faldon.org/user/1837/ 2006-03-18T19:46:40Z https://www.faldon.org/post/54244/#p54244