<![CDATA[Faldon Forums - On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/topic/3194/ Thu, 28 Apr 2005 06:05:30 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43376/#p43376 :twisted: Haha.

]]> Thu, 28 Apr 2005 06:05:30 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43376/#p43376 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43352/#p43352 Die (and Die Now!)

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:10:52 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43352/#p43352 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43351/#p43351 yay!

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:10:25 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43351/#p43351 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43344/#p43344

Don't mistake mercy for forgiveness.

Isn't that a Devildriver lyric ?

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:23:04 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43344/#p43344 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43343/#p43343

Gothic, still the tightass 12 year old who's balls havent dropped. Boy mommy must be continously proud of you. what a lucky lady... *barf*

And yes it is a topic, its a leading statement made to invoke conversation you twat, i think you were looking for the word "theme" now shut your face before you make mommy unhappy. bitchass newb.

Sinnir, still the drunk, arrogant, ignorant 20-somehting year old who knows neither grammar nor the use of the language. Am I deserving of yet another threat by your "friends" in Los Angeles yet? Oh please oh please say I am.

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:17:04 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43343/#p43343 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43326/#p43326 man, those insults are so overrated, we need to create more sophistication within the world. you are the piniest individual even recognized after the intense sorrow of the death of your mentality that i have ever aquainted myself with, now thats a great insult

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:53:43 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43326/#p43326 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43322/#p43322 Don't mistake mercy for forgiveness.

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:40:15 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43322/#p43322 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43320/#p43320 Such immaturity no wonder every leaves  :shock:

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:25:12 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43320/#p43320 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43319/#p43319 Gothic, still the tightass 12 year old who's balls havent dropped. Boy mommy must be continously proud of you. what a lucky lady... *barf*

And yes it is a topic, its a leading statement made to invoke conversation you twat, i think you were looking for the word "theme" now shut your face before you make mommy unhappy. bitchass newb.

]]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:15:19 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43319/#p43319 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43316/#p43316

Actually, technically, it is not. A topic has to have some sort of literary work to explain itself. It cannot exist without one, as stated by the rules of English, but then again the language and grammar of it is so horribly abused lets just call it a fucking topic.

That is not correct at all. The topic simply says that that is what conversation
will be discussed inside. He was simply starting the topic, it is up to us to
discuss. Though it hardly ever works as we often get sidetracked on this
forum.

]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:47:35 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43316/#p43316 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43315/#p43315 Actually, technically, it is not. A topic has to have some sort of literary work to explain itself. It cannot exist without one, as stated by the rules of English, but then again the language and grammar of it is so horribly abused lets just call it a fucking topic.

]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:36:07 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43315/#p43315 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43308/#p43308 Technically it is a topic even if it isnt practically

]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:29:06 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43308/#p43308 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43307/#p43307 Its not a topic at all considering you never went into a discussion about why you said that...I'd call it a title...maybe, or better yet just some ignorant babble being thrown around wildly as usual.  roll

]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:07:59 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43307/#p43307 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43298/#p43298 sinnir, pm me with contact info. As well as FB, Grayson, and any oldbies.

]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:33:12 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43298/#p43298 <![CDATA[Re: On the topic of String Theory applied to N-dimensions]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/43295/#p43295 Noob. -_-

]]> Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:38:02 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/43295/#p43295