<![CDATA[Faldon Forums - Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/topic/3810/ Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:13:42 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53534/#p53534 No signature back. Ty thanks bey

]]> Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:13:42 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53534/#p53534 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53325/#p53325

What is that suppose to mean =p I read the thread.. He wants his sig back.. but he was one of the reasons that sigs were taken away in the first place wink so I voted option 2 because I believe in that case we will get to shoot him.

Eehm, guess I shouldve switched those 2 quotes around, lol... just meant that Veega's answer was in the poll already ^^

Only for the self-proclaimed intelligent. For everyone else, there is no no-option.

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:25:18 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53325/#p53325 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53322/#p53322

What is that suppose to mean =p I read the thread.. He wants his sig back.. but he was one of the reasons that sigs were taken away in the first place wink so I voted option 2 because I believe in that case we will get to shoot him.

Eehm, guess I shouldve switched those 2 quotes around, lol... just meant that Veega's answer was in the poll already ^^

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:21:21 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53322/#p53322 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53315/#p53315 FB and his logical ways... What ever happened to stoning people and burning witches? ^^

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:58:17 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53315/#p53315 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53313/#p53313 What is that suppose to mean =p I read the thread.. He wants his sig back.. but he was one of the reasons that sigs were taken away in the first place wink so I voted option 2 because I believe in that case we will get to shoot him.

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:17:11 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53313/#p53313 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53309/#p53309

And where is the No option?

The reason sigs were taken away was because of size.. So it is all your fault.. So in that case I voted the second option since it pertained to you =p

Read a thread before posting. ;-)

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:02:09 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53309/#p53309 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53302/#p53302 And where is the No option?

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:26:33 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53302/#p53302 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53301/#p53301 Uhh, biggest sig I ever saw was that one girl's, with Jack Daniels distiller or whatever in it.

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:26:07 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53301/#p53301 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53300/#p53300 Oh, there are more victims?

]]> Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:54:01 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53300/#p53300 <![CDATA[Re: Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53239/#p53239 The reason sigs were taken away was because of size.. So it is all your fault.. So in that case I voted the second option since it pertained to you =p

]]> Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:54:00 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53239/#p53239 <![CDATA[Signature Back!]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/53236/#p53236 I want my signature back. Just because I had a picture the size of Chuck Norris in my signature before, doesn't mean it should be blocked forever.

]]> Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:10:08 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/53236/#p53236