<![CDATA[Faldon Forums - Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/topic/3866/ Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:22:02 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55589/#p55589

Well, if I recall correctly I chatted on irc whilst doing some questions now and then, so I'd have expected a lower score if it kept time. Also it ought to mention to a user that he is timed.

No.

]]> Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:22:02 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55589/#p55589 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55540/#p55540 Well, if I recall correctly I chatted on irc whilst doing some questions now and then, so I'd have expected a lower score if it kept time. Also it ought to mention to a user that he is timed.

]]> Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:40:18 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55540/#p55540 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55536/#p55536 Is it possible to implement counters into html, java, or whatever they used to create the site?  I'm just saying.  You guys could be right though, because I only got 120.  I kind of rushed myself and guessed a couple (wrongly too I suppose) because I did it on my 10 minute pre-lunch break. lol

I have taken a range of these because I always get them in emails, I have gotten scores ranging from 75 to 160.  So, I think they are all just a hoax to get you to sign up for something in the end.

]]> Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:31:33 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55536/#p55536 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55535/#p55535 Ideally yes, dunno if its true for this particular test though.

]]> Wed, 07 Jun 2006 04:11:54 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55535/#p55535 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55532/#p55532 Please, correct me if I'm wrong; and I know you will.  Aren't IQ tests also based on how long you take to answer the question in relation to how accurate your answer was?

]]> Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:51:47 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55532/#p55532 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55055/#p55055

Its easier to make it through that test while drinking smile

okay fine, I'll take it now <hic>

]]> Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:12:52 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55055/#p55055 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55052/#p55052 ME?!?!?!?!??!!   *Shocked face* 










But truly i cant spell.

]]> Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:22:56 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55052/#p55052 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55045/#p55045 kinda funny how neither of them can spell.

]]> Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:15:48 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55045/#p55045 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55037/#p55037 <3  let the marrage commence!

]]> Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:12:08 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55037/#p55037 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55021/#p55021

105, which is pretty good since last time i took one i got 72, which would roughly be the iq of a damp sponge.

Oi, my dear friend! Im a damp songe as well. Marry me!

]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:23:35 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55021/#p55021 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/55000/#p55000 105, which is pretty good since last time i took one i got 72, which would roughly be the iq of a damp sponge.

]]> Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:22:06 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/55000/#p55000 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/54819/#p54819 math is not my thing. 110.

there are other I.Q. tests out there that don't involve so much freaking math. I've scored higher, and this is why I believe that there is no such thing as a constant IQ, as I've had scores ranging from 95 to 136. So I'm not too disapointed.

]]> Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:03 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/54819/#p54819 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/54816/#p54816

[...]I don't feel like [...] Thus[...]

Gotta love that sort of reasoning ^_^

]]> Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:53:59 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/54816/#p54816 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/54815/#p54815 141 for what it's worth.

I don't know that I believe IQ tests.  I've read a few things that suggest they are flawed.  If it is true, that puts a number of us in genius category.  I dunno about the rest of you, but I don't feel like a genius.  Thus, the test is flawed. smile

]]> Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:12:52 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/54815/#p54815 <![CDATA[Re: Bragging rights]]> https://www.faldon.org/post/54812/#p54812

Was prolly high cuz you are 12 =p

Haha, nah seriously. 147, you prolly got 1 wrong then, am I right?

But considering it caps out at 150 points it must get less and less accurate with higher scores.

If it caps out at 150, why do you have a category for 151+, and why are there two people who claim to have recieved scores in that category?

1. Because Im not 100% sure about it capping out there, though I reckon it's highly likely. Considering the relation between scores and number of mistakes, they cant exactly let 1 mistake make a difference greater than 10 IQ points on the results, lol.
2. Because at the time of making the poll I hadnt thought of it yet.

And the 2 ppl claiming to be in that category havent said anything of use in the thread, so they prolly answered without taking the test.

]]> Mon, 10 Apr 2006 05:13:30 +0000 https://www.faldon.org/post/54812/#p54812