1

Topic: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

In short, George W. Bush was not elected President, nor does he deserve to be re-elected.  George W. Bush is the anti-thesis of democracy, he was never democratically elected to hold the office he now infests.  George W. Bush is the anti-thesis of unity, his policies divide America economically, politically and socially.  George W. Bush is the anti-thesis of America, as he promotes inequality, empire and democracy *when it works for him*. 

More than anything about his politics & policies, history or beliefs, I hate George W. Bush as a person.  He is a stupid, unfeeling, beady-eyed, lying, thieving and democracy usurping scum.

George W. Bush is a liar.  Al Gore lied too, but Al Gore only lied when his words were misconstrued and even then the "lies" were petty and meaningless.  George W. Bush's lies cost people a lot of money, time and effort.  Sometimes even their lives.  He lied about tax cuts, the reasons for invading the nation of Iraq, jobs, commitment to catch Osama bin Laden, the cost of the war in Iraq, the cost of his Medicare bill, willingness to fund NCLB, uniting the county as he claimed he would in 2000, a "humble foreign policy" and an "end to nation building". 

George W. Bush is stupid.  He chokes on pretzels, falls off bicycles, talks like a braindead cowboy butchering the English language and the laws of the civilized world.  The leader of the free world, in charge of thousands of nuclear weapons, should be able to pronounce the god damn word "nuclear" in a manner other than "nuk-yu-lar". 

George W. Bush is so stupid he believes his own lies.  He believes the lies people around him likely tell him about himself.  He believes, apparently, that he has been mandated by God to rule in this time and furthermore strike at the "evildoers" and destroy so-called terrorism.  Another guy believes God has mandated him to rule and kill, I call him Osama bin Laden.     

George W. Bush is callous.  He is almost entirely unfeeling to the suffering of millions in poverty, millions without healthcare, people losing their jobs in the millions, homosexuals that want to be able to marry, those with opposing political ideologies and cultures different from the way he perceives his own.

George W. Bush is not compassionate.  There is absolutely nothing compassionate about sending people to war for a giant pack of lies.  There is nothing compassionate about leaving people to an unfair, uneven and polarized economic situations and telling them to take responsibility for their own shitty living conditions.  There is absolutely nothing compassionate about telling people they cannot marry because it clashes with your own narrow-minded, ignorant and exclusionary religious values. 

George W. Bush's econmic policy is simple:  Take from the poor and give to the rich.  Whether it is through tax cuts, spending or just de-regulations and special favors to the corporations.

George W. Bush has convinced most of America that giving rich people more money fixes the economy.  The only thing fueling our economy right now is increased consumer, corporate and government spending.  While this is partially a result of tax breaks to middle-class families, it is by far largely done by government defense spending and increased corporate spending.  Both are good things, but they can't last.

The government is in debt, and will eventually have to stop.  When the economy starts to slow down again from the overheated nature it is enduring right now, corporations will pull back spending.  We don't need economic activity, we need economic balance.

Currently that balance doesn't exist.  The poor are getting poorer, the rich are getting richer.  Jobs are being created, but they are only replacing what was already lost and they are by far lower quality than what existed 4 years ago.  Healthcare costs are skyrocketing, tuition costs are multiplying and education programs are largely floundering and unfunded. 

And instead we are spending hundreds of billions of dollars to fight a threat that never existed in three parts of the world. 

Terrorism poses no significant threat to this country, yeah you heard me.  In two hundred years, they have managed one attack on our soil.  It was a fluke.  And now we are supposedly safer from the obscenely named Patriot Act anyways.  We are fighting a band of a few hundred loosely organized people with exceptionally crude technology.

The so-called threat is overplayed.  Dick Cheney and Bush would have us believe we are fighting a band of some millions of terrorists.  There are nowhere near that many.  Even the ones that are here are having a hard time organizing, planning and conducting attacks.  How do I know?  There hasn't been an attack on our soil after 9/11 by terrorists.  There also hasn't been one before that.

There are people that hate us in the world.  There are people capable of striking us.  But they are few in number, poor in organization and pathetic in terms of weaponry.  The likelihood of a dirty bomb, biochemical weapons, nuclear weapons or hijacks planes happening again is not likely. 

This is because it barely ever happens, has never happened in some cases and is very unlikely to happen for the rest due to difficulty of planning, gathering of materials and carrying out the attacks without getting caught.

A nation of paranoid people and a government that spies on its own people is certainly going to make it more difficult for them, but it is not needed.

The only terrorist threat in the world is fear as a concept.  We have let ourselves become afraid of terrorists, infact we have become scared silly of almost nothing.  They are a fly on our collective back, and that isn't just arrogance speaking.  We have started their wars, began their agendas of fear and division and we have given them the fear and change they wanted. 

Step by step, day by day, we are letting Osama bin Laden win. 

An America that can let its own citizens live in divided and poor conditions and let the rich get richer, while we all fight un-needed wars against and for things that never existed is not an America worth living in or defending.

2

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Terrorism poses no significant threat to this country, yeah you heard me.  In two hundred years, they have managed one attack on our soil.  It was a fluke.  And now we are supposedly safer from the obscenely named Patriot Act anyways.  We are fighting a band of a few hundred loosely organized people with exceptionally crude technology.

I wouldn't even call it a fluke. It was something the "we" knew was going happen, hence the infamous memo . . .

N.Y.T - Published: April 10, 2004 - WASHINGTON, April 9 — President Bush was told more than a month before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that supporters of Osama bin Laden planned an attack within the United States with explosives and wanted to hijack airplanes, a government official said Friday.

The warning came in a secret briefing that Mr. Bush received at his ranch in Crawford, Tex., on Aug. 6, 2001. A report by a joint Congressional committee last year alluded to a "closely held intelligence report" that month about the threat of an attack by Al Qaeda, and the official confirmed an account by The Associated Press on Friday saying that the report was in fact part of the president's briefing in Crawford.

The disclosure appears to contradict the White House's repeated assertions that the briefing the president received about the Qaeda threat was "historical" in nature and that the White House had little reason to suspect a Qaeda attack within American borders.

The Congressional report last year, citing efforts by Al Qaeda operatives beginning in 1997 to attack American soil, said that operatives appeared to have a support structure in the United States and that intelligence officials had "uncorroborated information" that Mr. bin Laden "wanted to hijack airplanes" to gain the release of imprisoned extremists. It also said that intelligence officials received information in May 2001, three months earlier, that indicated "a group of bin Laden supporters was planning attacks in the United States with explosives."

All in all, it was something they were aware of. Something that could have prevented. And something that when they failed to act on, causing the lives of thousands of Americans, they lied about to cover their tracks. Hail the Commander and Chief! Vote Bush '04!

3

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

________________________________________

HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT!!!

________________________________________


_______________________

VEEGA FOR GM!!!

_______________________

Destroyer of Worlds

4

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

10 simple reasons not to re-elect George W. Bush

1.  He was never elected to begin with and therefore cannot be re-elected, he lost the popular vote and the Supreme Court stopped democracy in its feet.

2. He presided over economic recession, gave tax cuts to the wealthy and then took credit for the eventually natural and shallow economic recovery.

3. Bush's unilateralist and pre-emptive foreign policy has left us alienated without allies and with no credibility.

4. Bush has given the terrorists precisely what they want: a divided world, fear and jihad.

5. Bush hasn't helped anyone besides the rich in getting richer.

6. The reasons we went to war for in Iraq were false, George W. Bush proceeded to joke about WMD, censor photos of death and coffins and then not attend any funerals.

7. After 9/11, Bush squandered the good will of the world by demanding mindless cooperation and invoking the name of God and moral righteousness on his and only his side.  He blatantly capitalized off of a national tragedy for political gain and his own short-sighted agenda in Iraq.

8. He has presided over literally unprecedented budget deficits so that the upper 1% can get more money they don't need, corporations can get even more tax breaks they also don't need, we can fight needless wars against elusive enemies around the world in places most people can't identify on a map and to attempt to privatize healthcare with more corporate welfare.

9. He has walked away from every global organization, treaty, alliance or united institution he could.  George decided to be the Lone Ranger, and to pursue only the ends of himself and his friends. 

10.  George W. Bush has fostered terrorism by marketing fear through the Department of Homeland Security, infringing on our rights through the obscenely named Patriot Act, encouraging division and anger in the world among our allies by pursuing only his own ends and making the real terrorists greater in number by botching the occupation of Iraq and failing to capture the majority of the Taliban or Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.

5

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Bill, I trust you watched the Democratic National Convention tonight. President Clinton's speach was truly wonderful.

6

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Wonderfull is an understatement. . one of the best i've heard in awhile. Al Gore's wasn't too bad, he actually had a few funny jokes in there. I can't wait to see tonights.

[img]http://www.geocities.com/o0o0ender0o0o/haxor.jpg[/img]

"And ye shall learn the truth, and the truth will make you free." (John 8:32)

</bush>

7

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

i missed the live convention, but i did catch a recap of clinton's speech, what can i say? he is an incredible public speeker......i did however, catch it last night, teresa heinz kerry is great, that's all i have to say about that  smile

http://www.southern.com/southern/band/CURSI/pics/cursive_index.jpg[/img]

8

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Most of what I've posted here (with the exception of parts of the Clinton speech) are reasons not to re-elect George W. Bush relating to his personality, his policies/positions and the results of 4 years of his presidency.

So to add a new element to this conversation, I would like to speak to you all about prospective voting.  That basically means what happens if Bush gets another 4 years in office.


War
For starters, we will have more wars.  There will be other Iraq's, other quagmires and needless and costly wars.  Prepare for nearly endless war to ravage and consume this nation in the name of "terrorism", "freedom" and "good".  Our allies will further be alienated from us, possibly beyond repair or reconciliation.  Casualties might be (and hopefully would be) relatively low in most of them, but the cost in money, time, potential and above all our moral standing will be enormous.

Whether the wars are with Syria, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia or even France or something comical like it, the result is the same.  More lies, more pretentious ideology, more division, more death.

More war.  George W. Bush in '04,  for four more wars.

Recession

History shows that the economy, job and stock markets tend to do worse under Republican presidents.  So far, George W. Bush has been no exception to the rule.  The economic 'recovery' right now is already falling victim to fears over inflation, energy prices, interest rates and the deficits.  Uncertainty in the country and around the world will only lend to these deterrents.

The rich will get richer.  The poor will go down the hole even farther.  Economic polarization will rise to levels the likes of which this country has never seen and never needs to see.  College costs will continue to skyrocket, health care coverage will be lost, the hungry will starve and this country will be shaken to its core.

Corporations might do better from honey deals, tax cuts, deregulation and general welfare from the government.  Expect at least 1 more major tax cut for the wealthy during these years as well.  It will likely be bigger than the previous ones, George likes to outdo himself.

The deficit will skyrocket.  Other nations will start to cut us off with either sanctions, tariffs or just higher prices.  When you tell the world to go screw itself, it tends to tell you the same thing.

A smirking, beady-eyed man with his arrogant swagger will continue walking the halls of the White House, knowing the bill is on us, my generation.  When the chicken comes home to roost, he'll be living it up with his billionaire buddies down in Crawfordsville, Texas.

Division

Don't count on Bush winning the election in any "democratic" way, even if he takes office.  If he wins, it is going to be close.  At this point, no poll suggests he is likely to win the popular vote.  Given the electoral closeness, it is likely to boil down to a few key votes, if not a tie itself.  Legal action is likely to repeat itself, especially with the great distrust people seem to have of machines counting their votes.

Republicans love polarization.  They prefer it.  They actually love it, come to think of it.  Strike that.  They crave polarization.  For these people, the extremely poor must exist so extremely rich can exist.  Extreme evil must be in existence for extreme good to need to exist for their wars (see Communism, Fascism, Terrorism). 

Political division must exist for them to make themselves seem more distinct, yet also more reasonable.  It must exist for them to appear more moral, in touch and representative of America at large.  It must exist for them to win, as shown in 2000. 

George W. Bush did the impossible while still failing to do the possible.  He dethroned Al Gore, a man that ran under times of peace, prosperity and with incumbency.  He won without winning.  The world, it seems, "misunderstimated" George W. Bush.

He needed inner-division among Democrats.  He needed to define Al Gore as robotic and himself as compassionate.  He needed to show them as some unacceptable liberal evil, while he himself was a "compassionate conservative".  They had to be, ironically enough, imperialists to his anti-nation building foreign policy.

He had to be humble compared to the aloof Al Gore. 

Republicans need polarization to define who they are, they need it to win electorally.  They need Democrats to stay bunched up in cities, to keep the minorities socially immobile and keep their faithful in line.

Fear

BOO! 

Just in case you forgot, you're supposed to be afraid.  Of what?  The terrorists of course.  They are just around the corner.  They want to kill you.  They hate freedom.  They hate America because we are free.  They don't like freedom fries either.

But don't fear, the Great Leader George W. Bush can save you.  His no negotiation attitude, no get help from them weak euro-pussies policies, absolute godly moral standing and go it alone Lone Rangeresque foreign plans will save us all.

God Bless America, and Support the Troops.  When we talk about war, we're really talking about peace.

Because war is the new peace of mind, after all.

George W. Bush will continue to use fear as a political weapon, invoking the symbol of 9/11 whenever he is doubted on national security or anything else, and silently branding others as traitors for disagreeing.  After all, he is patriotic.

He did, after all, signed the Patriot Act, which took away those annoying Civil Liberties those dirty liberals try to peddle.

Be afraid of tax hiking, ultra-liberal, out of touch, flip flopping cartoons named John Kerry too.

Infact, be so damn afraid you don't do anything but buy products from the same corporations that contribute largely to Bush and then don't question what he does.

You don't want to be unpatriotic, do you? Or are you a terrorist?

The Court-Appointed President that will appoint the courts

Be prepared for a lasting indent on our nation.  Bush will pick at least 2 young, conservative judges to take the place of retiring Supreme Court justices.

You can pretty much kiss any moderation goodbye and say hello to a long era of socially conservative judges at the national level.


A New America
Be prepared to no longer recognize this country.  Because when it is all done, America won't be the land of the freedom, equality or democracy anymore.

It will be the land of fear, cynicism and stagnation.

9

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

You know....this does belong in the trash heap.

10

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Is that supposed to be meant as an insult on what he is saying?

"We are a mass of seething fury, elected as your judge and jury. You stand accused of murder, vanity, and evil crimes against humanity."-Andy Martin

11

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

I certainly hope not.

12

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Amen

"We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice."

13

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

George W. Bush will continue to use fear as a political weapon, invoking the symbol of 9/11 whenever he is doubted on national security or anything else, and silently branding others as traitors for disagreeing. After all, he is patriotic.

Yet George W. Bush fails to mention that he might of prevented 9/11 happening and the fact that no other terrorist act ever happened on U.S soil before he became president.

Oh I walk around the corner and I walk around the block and I walk right into a donut shop.

14

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

I love the "acts" the current administration comes up with. They are so unbelievably contradicting. Anyone who honestly believes that the Patriot Act is in ANY way patriotic, needs to learn a lot. And anyone who truly believes that the Healthy Forests Act is creating healthy forests, and not a healthy logging industry, also needs some knowledge- or common sense. I could go on, but it just amazes me that the deception, and blatant dirty trickery starts at such a basic and elementary level; the naming of the acts themselves.

15

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Operation Iraqi Freedom was probably changed from Operation Iraqi Liberation, because if the second were chosen it would spell O.I.L. .

We wouldn't want anyone to figure out why we really went to war, after all.

16

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Omg, the truth is out there... what does your government take us for Bill? Sheep?

"We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice."

17

Re: Why George W. Bush doesn't deserve to be re-elected

Operation Iraqi Freedom was probably changed from Operation Iraqi Liberation, because if the second were chosen it would spell O.I.L. .

We wouldn't want anyone to figure out why we really went to war, after all.

I pointed that out over a year ago. =P

[img]http://www.geocities.com/o0o0ender0o0o/haxor.jpg[/img]

"And ye shall learn the truth, and the truth will make you free." (John 8:32)

</bush>