[ Closed ] John Kerry's Campaign Schedule

If you don't mind, FB, I'd like to point out a few incorrect statemets:

Even liberals don't listen to that.  That's why they can't find sponsors.

"Tereza" not "Teresa."  She is, afterall, a pretentious bitch.

Kerry only showers on ALTERNATE tuesdays.  Remember, he is a "dirty" liberal.

Not Al Gore.  Howard Dean.  YEAAAAAAH!

Not kiss, eat.  He's a baby-eating hippie.

Those last ones were seemingly omitted from your post.
( )

I just don't get it. How can you guys think the Bush is so great? in 20 or so years he is going to be known as our biggest mistake. I mean what kind of president can't even get out of his limo at his own inaugeration(sp?)? I am not on Kerry's side, I am just merely 100% totally and confidently against Bush.

That's very incorrect statement. I am well aware that you are die-hard liberal-hater, but the man has a plan for the future. I don't care if you don't agree with it, and I don't care if you condemn it, but it's there. What parts neccesary in "future planning" has he not touched on?

He has also made a campaign promise not to raise the taxes on the middle class, and raise them on the wealthiest Americans. Poor, poor wealthy Americans . . . 

Well, at least this isn't a biased statement. 

He makes stuff up, huh? SO he's a liar? So that most surely knocks him out as the possible next American president in your eyes? I'm laughing . . .

Because lairs are bad, this is true. And all politicians (most- the vast majority) lie, this is also true. Agreed so far?

So . . . it really comes down, unfortunately, to the degree of lies.

Now, has Kerry taken us into a war baised on lies, or things that are simply not true? Nope.

Has he promised to leave no child behind and done the opposite? Nope.

Has he promised to unite America and do the opposite? Nope.

I could go on . . .

NOW, granted he hasn't really had the chance . . . and hey, maybe he'll do all of these things if he is elected president.

That brings us to this whole Devil vs. Devil shit. Or, more realistically Devil vs. ???. When you know one is a Devil, you give the other guy a chance, because frankly what do you have to lose? That's why we have elections . . . If you elect someone and he screws up what he promises, loses jobs, fucks our economy, lies, and brings us into problems in record numbers, you pick the other guy. Thats logic, as I see it. If you don't do that, you might as well have eight year, one-terms.

But I REALLY disgress.

Another completely biased statement. Both canidates need to talk about the issues, niether are doing much of that. So instead of pointing the finger at Kerry and the Democrats, be a fair person, and point the finger at both- as I am.

John Kerry, stop talking about Bush's military record, and talk about the issues.

George W. Bush, stop talking about Kerry's military record, and talk about the issues.

Easy as that.

ACTUALLY, Bush condemned private orginazation's ads. He won't directly condemned the swiftboat ads, as Kerry did with moveon.org.

Which much of is bullshit, as pointed out by people here like Catbert and myself. Maybe you didn't read that?

Also, Bush has done his fair share of flip-flopping. too. Yeah, It's true.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.

Maybe you hated the man. Maybe you didn't agree with his policies. And maybe a blow job is the biggest crime in the world, to you.

The facts are, it worked. We had more money, we had more jobs, the middle-class was larger, and we weren't considered international terrorists. Life was better, America was better.

Bush is, and I imagine for a very long time, will be considered our biggest mistake. I am sure history will prove this.

Really?  What are his plans exactly.  Keeping in mind that a plan consists both of what you are hoping to accomplish (i.e. a better economy) and how you plan to reach it, which is what Kerry has failed to do.

But he's spent the last 20 years raising taxes on the middleclass.  No integrity.

That depends on whether or not he actually believes what he says to be the truth.  If he believes he's telling the truth when he says that Bush is controlling the Swiftboat group, or that Bush has done nothing to about healthcare, or that Bush is responsible for the economy, then no, he's not a liar.  Merely misinformed.

I agree.

Nope, but neither did bush.  I refer you to the Senate intelligence comittee and the 911 commision.  The only thing that Bush was wrong about was the physical WMDs.  And, even in that, they had everything they needed to create them, other than the nuclear material, which Saddam was in the process of purchasing from Niger.  And, given the 2 dozen+ sources from the global intelligence community that gave us the information which lead to war, I tend to think he believed what he said, not lied.

THAT'S a biased statement.  Bush is the one trying to steer the debates back to the issues (such as Kerry's record in the Senate) and Kerry is the one who is still stuck on the whole swiftboat thing.  If he really wanted to get past it, he would simply come out and answer all the questions at once, then leave it at that.

So...  Bush should stop telling the press that he believes Kerry served honorably?  You do know he's already done that, many times in fact.

Bush condemned all the ads, including the swiftboat ones.  He did so on national television.  Now, when exactly did Kerry condemn MoveOn, and where can I find something on it?

You mean, it's bullshit in your opinion.  The arguments I've seen that say he isn't a flip-flopper are weak at best.

You mean like when he said we were going to war, and then we did?  Wait, that's not it.  When exactly did he flip-flop?
(Actually, I'm sure he did at some point, as all politicians do.  But comparing Bush's flip-flopping to Kerry's is like comparing the heat from a lit match to that of a detonated Nuke. )

I have nothing against a BJ.  That was NEVER my problem with him.  My problem stems from all the things he did while that "contraversy" was going on.  You know, like shutting down roads and making the surrounding land into National Preserves, which killed the local economy of the ump-teen small towns in the midwest which relied on those roads.  Or how about him releasing known murders from Federal prison; the majority of which killed again within a year?  Or, simply, the fact that he stood before a grand jury, comitted Perjury, and got off without any punishment by debating the meaning of the word "is."

First off, you're just being silly if you think that the president has anything substantial to do with the economy.  Also, as Ive said before, the economy began to tank before Bush even took office.  Blaming him is just plain ignorant.
And to say that life/the country was better is just stupid.  The middleclass was taxed more under Clinton than any other president (including Bush). Clinton DOUBLED the size of the federal ledger (which means he singed more laws into effect than any other president).  And his lack of planning left the economy in shambles, our intelligence community in shambles, and the normal, everyday people with next-to-no rights under the law.  "America was better" is a fact?  You need to check your facts.

Our parties are alot like yours, only without the protesting, the whining about Bush, and all the gay sex!